The battle for livable wages pits working Americans vs. working Americans


Fast food workers marching
 
Income inequality has been the third rail of American politics and social discussions for some time now.  It is far more than talking points.  It is REAL.  The “1%” that has become a large part of the political lexicon in America owns a STAGGERING 37% of ALL the wealth in America.  (Bloomberg: The 1% May Be Richer Than You Think, Research Shows)  According to the Forbes List, 40 of the wealthiest 100 people in the world live in America.  One family on particular, the Walton Family – the heirs of the Walmart fortune - has a combined wealth that exceeds the cumulative wealth of 43% of the lowest earning Americans.  Process that for a moment.  One FAMILYONE family – has a combined wealth greater than approximately 126,000,000 Americans (Just how wealthy is the Wal-Mart Walton Family).  We know how successful Walmart is.  We also know how the Waltons are not in love with paying their employees a livable wage.  A significant number of Walmart employees are eligible for some form of public assistance - be it Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF) commonly referred to as welfare, Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) (food stamps), Medicaid or federal housing subsidies (Section 8).   In fact, Walmart employees ALONE cost tax payers $6.2 billion a year in public assistance.  (Forbes: Walmart Workers Cost Taxpayers $6.2 billion in Public Assistance) Question: Which welfare queen does more damage to the country – someone working a minimum wage job while continuing to receive public assistance or a company with a gross annual income of $475 billion but pays its employees so poorly they need public assistance to make it?  (From the Daily Kos – Walmart: America’s real Welfare Queen) There is something wrong when the family that is worth more than nearly 126,000,000 Americans runs a company where such a large number of the people who work for them qualify for public assistance.  That is simply IMMORAL 
Conservatives, of course, see nothing wrong with that scenario at all.  They believe the “free market” should dictate financial worth.  That hard work is the simple cure for income inequality.  Never mind the fact there are 10 million Americans who work for a living and yet live below the poverty line.  (Washington Post: Here’s why 10.4 million American workers are still in poverty) Conservatives use buzz terms like “redistribution of wealth” and “socialism” to discourage any discussion about leveling the playing field when it comes to Americans who DO work and still live in poverty.  They will tell you those working poor should just work harder and they, too, will reach the “1%” status.  That is the biggest lie told since kids in my generation (I was born in 1960) were told we could run FASTER and jump HIGHER if we only had a pair of PF FLYERS.  That is MIND INTERCOURSING of the highest order.  If only becoming wealthy WERE that simple.  President Obama has introduced legislation that would raise the federal minimum wage from $7.25 an hour to $10.10 an hour.  The Republicans, despite the fact an overwhelming number of Americans favored raising the minimum wage, wouldn’t even consider the legislation.  President Obama did raise the minimum wage for government contract workers to $10.10 by Executive Order.  Some states have taken it upon themselves to raise the minimum wage and the city of Seattle has raised the minimum wage to $15 an hour.  Again, most Americans agree the minimum wage should be raised and therefore should demand their representatives on all levels – local, state and federal – make that become reality.  As united Americans are on this issue, the debate is what the MINIMUM wage should be as opposed to what a LIVIABLE wage should be.  There is where Americans who work for a living DON’’T agree.  The battle for livable wages pits working Americans vs. working Americans. 
Over the last 12 months or so, we’ve seen fast food restaurant workers go on one day
strikes and demonstrate in front of fast food restaurants all over the country.  These workers are demanding the FEDERAL minimum wage be raised to a LIVABLE wage of $15 an hour.  Those workers, who definitely work hard, say they can’t support themselves and their families on $7.25 an hour, which comes to $15,080 a year.  Broken down further, that is a gross monthly income of $1,256.  Wage earners on this scale would be in the 25% tax bracket, approximately, which would leave them with an approximate net income of $942.50.  In whatever part of the country you live in, it is highly improbable that you can pay rent or a mortgage, pay utilities, buy food, pay life and medical insurance premiums, pay for and maintain an automobile, save at least 10% of your net income and then have some discretionary income left after you take care of all that.  In fact, it is IMPOSSIBLE to do.  These workers are asking to be paid at least $15 an hour - $31, 200 annual gross income.  Those wages would put those wage earners in the 30-35% tax bracket and at best, that comes out to a net monthly income of $1,820.  Not exactly living in the lap of luxury, mind you, but a lot more realistic to live off of.  Makes sense, right?  Not so fast.  Republicans and a majority of the business community oppose a $15 an hour minimum wage, of course, but the bulk of the opposition is coming from OTHER American workers.  Right.  Working stiffs.  Working stiffs who seemingly are INSULTED because other Americans holding jobs they deem menial – “burger flippers” and “order takers” – have the nerve and AUDACITY to want to make more money so they can take care of themselves and their families.  A gross misnomer is that only teenagers and young adults between 20 and 22 years of age work in fast food restaurants.  Nothing could be further from the truth.  Another gross misnomer is that fast food workers are the ONLY Americans who work for the current minimum wage.  Again, nothing could be further from the truth.  A large part of the resistance comes from Americans who make more than the minimum wage but less than $15 an hour.  In a strange and contorted way of thinking, those wage earners consider themselves in a different “class” than those minimum wage earners.  For them, it is matter of maintaining their “prestige’ over the “”burger flippers” and “order takers”.  Never mind many of them qualify for some form of public assistance, too.  The real fear within those narrow minded circles is that if the “burger flippers” and “order takers” were successful, they would then be forced to either ask THEIR employers for a pay raise or look for another job that pay more.  The obvious by product is missed completely.  Guess what?  If fast food workers and other Americans who work for the minimum wage are successful, then other Americans will flock to those employers seeking jobs because the pay is better than where they currently work.  Study after study has shown that fast food consumers would pay an extra 25 cents to offset the pay increases.  That pretty much kills the argument that restaurants would go out of business if they were forced to pay $15 an hour.  Working Americans in opposition of raising the minimum wage would be forced to take a stand and be shaken out of their complacency.  They may even realize THEY and their families would benefit, too.  For some, that is much too risky.  The “burger flippers” and “order takers” would have more discretionary income and that alone would stimulate the economy.  It is a simple formula.  More money would be circulating within the economy.  More importantly, employers would then be in a position where they would have to COMPETE for employees, thus forcing an across the board pay raise for 37% of the lowest paid Americans.  The competition for employees would appear to satisfy the “free market” mantra of the conservatives.  They’re all about working hard and competing, right?  In addition to stimulating the economy and creating demand – and thus creating jobs – for goods and services in general, a $15 an hour minimum wage would reduce the number of working Americans qualifying and receiving various forms of public assistance; therefore freeing up money to fund public education, infrastructure projects and enhanced public safety.  This is your basic “cause and effect” formula. 

As simple as it would seem to be, there will still be resistance from working Americans.  Those working Americans who will be in opposition will say those “burger flippers” and “order takers” should get a better education and/or look for another job.  That’s a fair point.  The perception will be those underclass workers would have an advantage they wouldn’t have and that is simply unfair.  Never mind that fast food restaurants are making record profits and certainly can afford to pay higher wages.  In fact, American companies in general are sitting on $3 TRILLION in profits and can afford to pay higher wages.  They don’t because they don’t HAVE to.  Most American workers are content to make a way off the crumbs disguised as wages while the CEO and shareholders make off with the whole LOAF.  That is text book divide and conquer of the American workforce.  Position wage earners to be resentful of OTHER wage earners while the big shots make off with the REAL money.  Sigh.  WHEN will we LEARN? 
The politicians who oppose a minimum wage increase can be dealt with on Election Day this coming Tuesday (November 4).  Your displeasure with them can be settled at the ballot box.  The Republicans have to sell people on the premise they will be better OFF if they had LESS of everything – less income, less healthcare, less public education, less regulations, less public safety and less sound infrastructure as in roads and bridges.  Of course, that only pertains to the bulk of Americans – the “takers”.  The “makers” … the “1%” are ENTITLED to all they can get.  Since most Americans agree the minimum wage should be raised, the Republicans should be held accountable for their dogged resistance to putting more money in the pockets of working Americans.  After all, they are the party that constantly tells the American people there is dignity in work.  Correction: there is dignity in work that allows one to support themselves.  THAT is the dignity in work.  Where there needs to be a meeting of the minds is within the circle of working Americans. 
If the MINIMUM wage becomes a LIVABLE wage, that would be a good thing for America.  The discord between working Americans on this issue is misplaced and regressive.  The discord is shameful. 
Sadly, the battle for livable wages pits working Americans vs. working Americans. 
Peace, peace.
 
Craig Riggins
Facebook: The Riggins Report
Twitter: @CraigRiggins
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

 
 
 

Comments